Am Orthopt J    42:135-141 (1992)

Comparison of Titmus® and Two Randot ^(TM) Tests in Monofixation

Maria A. Schweers, C.O. John D. Baker, M.D.

Patients with monofixation syndrome having reduced stereoacuity were studied using the Titmus® Stereo Test and two forms of the Randot^(TM) Stereo Test.
The results show a difference in stereopsis in these patients when using the Randot^(TM) 1 compared with Randot^(TM) 2 and Titmu®. This difference is related to the fact that all of Randot^(TM) I is a true random-dot stereogram while most of Randot^(TM) 2 and Titmus® are nonrandom-dot stereograms.

Random-dot stereograms are more difficult for patients with monofixation. It is important not to confuse the two forms of the Randot^(TM) Stereo Test, for each has a unique purpose.

© 1992 The Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System
[Home] [Current Table of Contents] [Search]